"Ad" Astra
I have a brother at Purdue, and he sent me this article about NASA trying to recruit youth to be avid little space nuts (like my brother).
I liked most of what the article had to say, but this part irritated me a little:
The communications experts also want NASA to use new technologies such as podcasts and YouTube to reach young people who are turning away from older information sources such as TV news and newspapers.
While I am all for any company trying to keep up with technology (especially, well, NASA...), is it possible that podcasts and YouTube videos won't stimulate EVERY BRAND? These "communications experts" don't seem to be forging any new territory here. My point isn't that NASA shouldn't attempt viral marketing-- it's that they shouldn't need "communications experts" to give them the idea.
With that aside, I still wonder what this kind of approach would do for NASA. I see NASA podcasts more as a brand strengthener than a brand reviver, because chances are the people tuning in are going to be... well, my space case brother.
...And in my opinion, that's how it ought to be anyway. I don't want every kid with iTunes and a YouTube account knocking at NASA's door for a job. I guess part of this is just my resistence to NASA's idea of hiring a celebrity-- I guess as a spokesman-- to promote interest in its programs. Still, if NASA is this hellbent on attracting kids... well, WonderGroup could work up one hell of an "Ad Astra." ;)


2 Comments:
I think that if NASA was going to try to reach the younger market, they should go a lot more specific than YouTube. There are plenty of prospering organizations that support young people in science and technology. One of these, at least, is already supported by NASA (FIRST robotics), and I think that's where their focus probably should be.
I also wonder if they might do more in the way of grants for school programs that inspire kids to learn more about space-- my middle school has been working since its inception to improve its space simulator. Kids in the "space" class plan and execute missions, sometimes for full school days, using a computer flight simulation program, actual communication techniques, and even a robotic arm outside the "shuttle." For me, being 'Commander' of a mission did a lot more than any YouTube video could.
January 22, 2007
You have to think of accessibility here as well. Youtube is the MySpace of video now. It's a great first step to expose kids to NASAs vast quantity of content. Schools (especially under funded ones) can't alway provide material for kids. Youtube is low cost on both ends (free). And honestly, sometimes it takes a well respected "communication expert" to break out of the old regime.
January 29, 2007
Post a Comment
<< Home