I’ve been having quite a few conversations lately about social media—especially things like tagging your photographs and favorite websites. There seem to be two polarized schools of thought on the subject:
- Tagging, ranking, etc is a pointless waste of time, i.e. “I don’t get it,” or
- Tagging, ranking, etc is the freakin’ future. (Guess which school I belong to!)
In light of the fact that I haven’t posted anything of substance for months, I thought I’d sound off on the tagging topic for a bit.
Alright. As a democracy, we talk about voting as not only a right, but a responsibility. It’s up to you as a responsible American citizen to be heard. It’s your job to represent your party, your age, your gender, your lifestyle, your religion…
I am only barely exaggerating when I say that I see tagging in the same way. I believe that as people who use services such as Flickr, it is a social responsibility to “give back” by feeding the Web 2.0 Machine.
Let me give you an example: The Commons. Flickr has partnered with the Library of Congress (that’s right—the government gets it) to tag an inspiring collection of their photography. In Flickr's own words the project has two purposes... first, to show off the collections to a wider audience, and secondly, "to facilitate the collection of general knowledge about these collections, with the hope that this information can feed back into the catalogues, making them richer and easier to search."
That is tagging. User input that makes the web smarter, faster, more searchable, richer, more intuitive.
Take this example from The Commons: a
woman working on a B-25 bomber. At first glance it seems like every semantically-related tag has been added: wartime, military, women at war. But what you can also see is that other languages are starting to seep into the tags. Why shouldn't a Spanish speaker be just as able to access our awesome Library of Congress collections?
But that's the catch: it takes a tag-happy Spanish speaker to get the job done. Preferably, more than one. And it's like that with all walks of life: more taggers = more races, languages, beliefs, backgrounds = more semantic goodness. The web does not get smarter on its own, though it often seems that way.
Let me give you a few more instances of useful or interesting tagging. First, a new way at
browsing Flickr. Here's a
visualization using geotagging, which deserves its own post here some day.
View Larger MapAnother:
Last.fm. You see those related artists in the left-hand column? Those don't just appear there, nor is there a dedicated keyboard-monkey typing creating the necessary data; those related artists are all based on the tags and input from Last.fm users. (The information about the bands are also user generated, wiki-style.) For another visualization based on metatags try
TuneGlue, which I have blogged
before.
Another (I could do this all day):
del.icio.us. I am crazy about this site, which takes the bookmarking concept and makes it social. Tagging your favorite websites helps the web "understand" how to classify those sites.
StumbleUpon is similar, recommending other sites you might like based on tagging and ranking systems.
Alright, blah blah blah, you've seen these sites before. Back to my point: these tagging and ranking systems do not happen on their own, and one of their purposes is to fuel the move into semantic web, also sometimes referred to as Web 3.0. This is when the web moves beyond a labeling system and begins "thinking," almost.
Consider when you go to
Google Maps and type in just a zip code. Google Maps
knows it's a zip code, and can anticipate what you want to do with it. Think back to your early MapQuest days, when you had to correctly fill out forms or else receive error messages. The data was just data... streets in the street box, cities in the city box. Five numbers meant nothing to the program. A zip code is our own semantic construction...
we know what we want, and the internet is just beginning to think like us.
Teaching the internet isn't all in the hands of programmers and software engineers. In order for it to think like you, to anticipate you and understand your requests, it is your social responsibility to tell the web how you think.
So go vote!
Labels: semantic, tagging, web2.0, web3.0